Amyntor, or, A Defence of Milton's Life ...
Amyntor, or, A Defence of Milton's Life Containing I. A General Apology for All Writings of That Kind. II. A Catalogue of Books Attributed in the Primitive Times to Jesus Christ, His Apostles and Other Eminent Persons: With Several Important Remarks and Observations Relating to the Canon of Scripture. III. A Complete History of the Book Entitul'd Icon Basilike, Proving Dr. Gauden and Not King Charles the First to Be the Author of It: With an Answer to All the Facts Alledg'd by Mr. Wagstaf to the Contrary; and to the Exceptions Made Against My Lord Anglesey's Memorandum, Dr. Walker's Book or Mrs. Gauden's Narrative, Which Last Piece Is Now the First Time Publish'd at Large
London: n.p., 1699.
Topics:
3. Sacrifice and politics (16th-18th Century) 6. Sacrifices of self: Martyrology after Reformation (16th-18th Century)
3. Sacrifice and politics (16th-18th Century) 6. Sacrifices of self: Martyrology after Reformation (16th-18th Century)
Authority file: http://viaf.org/viaf/66497400
Edited by: Francesco Quatrini
Related Documents:
Eikōn ē pistē. Or, the Faifhfull Pourtraicture of a Loyall Subject, in Vindication of Eikon Basilike. Otherwise Intituled The Pourtraicture of His Sacred Majestie, in His Solitudes and Sufferings. In Answer to an Insolent Book, Intituled Eikōn alēthinē: Whereby Occasion Is Taken, to Handle All the Controverted Points Relating to These Times
n.p.: n.p., 1649.
Vindiciae Carolinae, or, A Defence of Eikon basilikē, the Portraicture of His Sacred Majesty in His Solitudes and Sufferings in Reply to a Book Intituled Eikonoklastes, Written by Mr. Milton, and Lately Re-Printed at Amsterdam
London: J.L.; Luke Meredith, 1692.
Dr. Hollingworth's Defence of K. Charles the First's Holy and Divine Book, Called Eikon Basilikē; Against the Rude and Undutiful Assaults of the Late Dr. Walker of Essex. Proving by Living and Unquestionable Evidences, the Aforesaid Book to Be That Royal Martyr's, and Not Dr. Gauden's
London: Samuel Eddowes, 1692.
Dr. Walker's True, Modest, and Faithful Account of the Author of Eikōn basilikē, Strictly Examined, and Demonstrated to Be False, Impudent, and Deceitful. In Two Parts, the First Disproving It to Be Dr. Gauden's. The Second Proving it to Be King Charles the First's
London: R. Talor, 1693.
A Vindication of King Charles the Martyr, Proving That His Majesty Was the Author of Eikon Basilike. Against a Memorandum, Said to Be Written by the Earl of Anglesey; and Against the Exceptions of Dr. Walker, and Others
London: Joseph Hindmarsh, 1693.